Mission Statement

"Our mission is to retain within Clare and rural areas, primary and secondary schools that will realise the full educational and social potential of our children and young people".

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

Want to keep up to date with news and developments? Just mail us at support@our-community-our-school.co.uk and we'll add you to our mailing list.

Thursday 29 January 2009

£1.3bn wasted hiring school consultants reports the Sunday Express

According to the Sunday Express, the Government is throwing away more than £1.3billion on consultants for its flagship school rebuilding scheme.

The article reads:-

Thousands of “experts” are ­being paid to advise on colour schemes, organise building teams and say which companies should get ­construction contracts. But critics say the cash should be spent on ­improving schools.

Shadow Schools Minister Nick Gibb uncovered the wasted money in the same week that an independent report revealed that new or ­refurbished buildings alone will not raise pupil performance.

Ministers have been forced to ­admit that three per cent of the ­total £45billion funding for the Buildings Schools for the Future Programme (BSF) is ­being spent on consultant services. “

"Ed Balls’s department is woefully behind schedule with its school refurbishment programme,” said Mr Gibb.“Now we see that hundreds of millions of pounds is due to be spent on consultants rather than better classrooms and facilities.”

The figures angered teachers as hundreds of schools face years of waiting before the cash for their ­revamp becomes available under the rebuilding scheme.An independent evaluation of BSF last week noted that it had made progress in improving its ­efficiency but is still well behind the Government’s original targets.

Perhaps most alarmingly, the ­investigation by PricewaterhouseCoopers concluded that pupils would not improve academically because school buildings were ­either rebuilt or done up.

Significant other changes in how the school operated were found to be essential to any real improvement.One head teacher, whose school was totally rebuilt, told researchers: “I have inherited staff from the old school and some are brilliant but some not so much. A good 60 per cent of staff have not changed their teaching practices. "There is a long way to go to break the culture and cycles they are in. We’ve ­succeeded with ­students but it’s harder to engage the staff.”

When the plan to overhaul ­England’s decrepit schools was ­announced in 2003, ministers pledged to have 200 schools rebuilt or refurbished by the end of last year. So far, only 50 have been completed with teachers reporting a “significant drop in morale” when they wait for refurbishment.

One teacher, who asked not to be named, said: “If you are earmarked for a revamp local authorities stop spending money doing quite important repairs because they know it will all be done eventually under BSF. That’s all very well for pupils in the future, but it makes those currently attending the school feel that no one cares about them.”

Over the last two years, spending on consultants in Ed Balls’s Children, Schools and Families department has more than doubled. The amount spent on consultants rose from £30million in 2005/6 under the Department for Education and Skills to £72million in 2007/8. That money could have paid for more than 2,000 teachers.

In the last two years the Department has presided over a series of debacles, including the SATs fiasco and chaos surrounding this year’s Educational Maintenance Allowance (EMA) payments.

Shadow Children’s Secretary Michael Gove said: “It’s extraordinary that spending on consultants has more than doubled in two years even though Ed Balls’s department is smaller than its predecessor. “Despite spending millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money extra on outside help, on his watch the department has lurched from one fiasco to another, whether it’s losing thousands of exam papers or chronic delays to student maintenance payments.”

Further delays to BSF may occur because of the credit crunch. Construction industry leaders say that if the private funding often needed to top up individual projects dries up, many schools may have to wait even longer for much needed refurbishment.

Margaret Morrissey, founder of the education pressure group Parents Outloud, said: “Building Schools for the Future was a grand scheme, announced with typical Labour fanfare. It promised much, but as with most things, the reality has been a disappointment.”

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/81742/-1-3bn-wasted-hiring-school-consultants

Friday 23 January 2009

Clare school campaigners win MP's backing

TORY MP Tim Yeo has accused Suffolk County Council of turning its back on both Labour and Conservative principles by ruling out a community's bid to turn a middle school into an upper school as reported in the East Anglian Daily Times.

The county council is seeking to close all 40 middle schools and expand both primary and upper schools to take the extra pupils.One of those earmarked for closure is Clare Middle School. But those living in Clare have set up an organisation called Clare and Local Area for Rural Education (CLARE) aimed at saving the middle school site and forging a brand new upper school, which would be called the Stour Valley Community College.

However the county council has ruled out the idea as not “viable” claiming it would cost about £7million to set up - something denied by the CLARE group.

South Suffolk MP Tim Yeo has now written to the county council's portfolio holder for children and young people Patricia O'Brien claiming if the Tory council was “genuinely Conservative” it would not dismiss the campaigners' hopes out of hand.

"I am afraid it looks very much as though your decision has been driven by a slavish following of Labour dogma about “optimum” school size and increasing spending in urban areas,” Mr Yeo said. “It is clearly not based on what are the ingredients of a good and popular school or any understanding of how creating more choice will drive up standards in all schools. Conversely, there is no recognition of the detrimental impact the creation of new monopolistic super-schools is having on discipline and educational standards"

http://www.eadt.co.uk/content/eadt/news/story.aspx?brand=EADOnline&category=News&tBrand=EADOnline&tCategory=news&itemid=IPED21%20Jan%202009%2023%3A17%3A45%3A737

Thursday 22 January 2009

Letter from Hartest Parish Council to C.L.A.R.E

HARTEST PARISH COUNCIL
Parish Clerk: Mrs P M Lamb, Sayesbury House, Ixworth Road, Norton,
Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP31 3LJ Tel No: 01359 233288
website: www.hartest.com email: parishclerk@hartest.com

21 January 2009
Mr T Souster
C.L.A.R.E.
c/o 26 Hertford Road
Clare
Sudbury
Suffolk CO10 8QJ

Dear Mr Souster,

Stour Valley Community College

Members have asked me to write and thank you, and your colleagues, for the very interesting and informative presentation you gave re the above at our last PC meeting on the 7 January.

The Parish Council Members have asked me to advise you that they are unanimous in supporting the establishment of a Community College at Clare in the belief that it will give our children - the next generation - the correct educational foundations on which to develop their futures. Members are gravely concerned that current proposals involve the increase in pupil numbers at the existing schools which currently have insufficient spare capacity and low attainment results.

The proposals put forward by yourselves are eminently sensible and pragmatic; utilising and developing existing facilities and building on the good academic standards already achieved. The specialisms you are offering are much needed in this region and widen the choice for pupils with scientific abilities and interests.

The Parish Council’s opinion also reflects the outcome of the survey conducted in Hartest.

Would you please keep us up to date with your progress?

With all success in your endeavours.

Yours sincerely

Pat Lamb

P M LAMB (Mrs)
Parish Clerk

Thursday 15 January 2009

Super school for Felixstowe........how long before Haverhill and Sudbury suffer the same fate?!

A report by Felixstowe TV has confirmed that plans to close two secondary schools in the town and open a new super school have been give the go ahead. Despite parents concerns and 67% saying the school would be too large, SCC have given the go ahead. The report reads:-


Plans to merge Felixstowe's two high schools into one new superschool for over 1,800 students are being recommended to be given the go-ahead at a Suffolk County Council Cabinet meeting next Tuesday.

The council is planning to close Orwell and Deben High Schools, to be replaced by one new secondary and sixth form (age 11 - 19) school, on the Orwell site between Maidstone Road and Walton High Street. The proposal is part of the government's national Building Schools for the Future (BSF) initiative, involving the rebuilding, remodelling or refurbishment of secondary schools across the country, focussed around changing the way that learning takes place.

A total of 564 parents, carers and local residents responsed to a 12-week consultation during the autumn. Of those who responded, just over half (53%) said their preference would be to keep the two schools, with 47% saying there should be a single secondary school for Felixstowe and Trimley. Two thirds of those who responded (67%) said one school with 1,800 students would be too large. Six out of ten said that they were concerned (22%) or very concerned (37.5%) by the loss of parental choice of school if Deben and Orwell became a single school.


To read the full story visit:- http://www.felixstowetv.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3326&Itemid=30

Sunday 4 January 2009

'Council ignore local views' reports the Haverhill Echo

SUFFOLK County Council has been accused of ignoring the wishes of the rural community in deciding not to support plans for a secondary school in Clare.


In a series of letters, community organisations in Clare have attacked the decision not to support proposals to create Stour Valley Community College (SVCC).

Follow the link below to read full story:-

http://www.haverhillecho.co.uk/news/Council-has-39ignored39-local-views.4834346.jp