Mission Statement

"Our mission is to retain within Clare and rural areas, primary and secondary schools that will realise the full educational and social potential of our children and young people".

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

Want to keep up to date with news and developments? Just mail us at support@our-community-our-school.co.uk and we'll add you to our mailing list.

Wednesday, 19 March 2008

Key skills needed!

Community Appeal
- Professional help

Following the Suffolk County Council Cabinet decision to adopt Option One for the Haverhill area
C.L.A.R.E. is about to embark upon the next phase of the campaign to secure secondary education for the rural communities on the Clare Middle School site. To help further the cause the campaign team would welcome help from present or former professionals who may be prepared to donate some of their expertise and time in the following areas;

School Financial and Statistical Information Management.

Education Law,

Project Management.

Campaign Management.

Proposal to Local/Central Government Writing.

Secondary School Management.

Secondary School Facility Development [Architectural or Planning]

The campaign would be grateful if you know someone with these or other useful professional skills if you could approach them with a view to enlist their valuable help. Anyone who would like to find out more can contact us via the e mail address below or by telephoning the Chair.

Thank you.
Jim Meikle.
Chair.


support@our-community-our-school.co.uk
Tel: 01787 278476

Tuesday, 18 March 2008

Observer reports - Hundreds of village schools face axe!

Hundreds of village schools across Britain are being closed, despite a long-term pledge by the government to maintain education in the countryside. The policy U-turn will affect 30,000 children in up to 300 schools in its first stage, The Observer has learnt. Campaigners warned last night that the 'nightmare scenario' would see more than 1,000 small schools in England and Wales at risk. The closures are taking place despite a promise by education minister Stephen Byers in 1998 that village schools would be protected

Full story at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/jan/27/politics.schools

Friday, 14 March 2008

NEWSLETTER - MARCH 08

Welcome to the C.L.A.R.E newsletter, keeping you up to date with our campaign for rural education.

With the support of parents, teachers, governors, local businesses, societies, groups, councillors and MPs, C.L.A.R.E has been campaigning to keep secondary education in Clare. Option 3 of the School Organisation Review provided the solution allowing for three secondary schools within the Haverhill cluster, two in Haverhill and one in Clare. However, on 4th March 2008, the cabinet voted unanimously in favour of Option 1, two secondary schools only, both in Haverhill.

Although bitterly disappointed, we are not deterred. In fact, we are more determined than ever that Clare WILL get its secondary school. We believe that Clare town can continue to support future education in the area and is the best option for the children and the local community.
C.L.A.R.E will shortly be holding a public meeting for which details will follow; however in the meantime, here is some food for thought…

· Under Option 1, both of the two Haverhill schools will be larger than the council’s preferred optimum size of 900-1200 pupils. Recent research has proved that smaller schools perform better. Option 3 would keep pupil numbers to a respectable size and allow for future growth. Sudbury, Haverhill and indeed villages across the Essex border will all see considerable building development over the next decade.

· The School Organisation review promised better education for 14-18 year olds with provision for a purpose-built sixth form centre in Haverhill. This will now be assessed under a separate consultation for which there has been no timescales set. Until such time, Castle Manor and Samuel Ward will continue to have sixth forms as before.

· Clare pupils previously had the choice of Haverhill or Sudbury upper schools. Sudbury is in phase two of the review which is two years behind and therefore no longer a choice. Parents of children on the Sudbury side of Clare middle school are still waiting clarification. Those applying to schools outside their catchment area are not being accepted. There is no parental choice.

· We have been informed that there will be a separate consultation to move the Clare primary school to the middle school site. The site is totally unsuitable for primary school children and we would assume will be revamped. Current facilities in the middle school would not be available as the national curriculum for this age group does not require them. Why is the council considering moving the school? If it is a question of space, where do the local small village primaries fair? Could we be looking at a large ‘Rural’ primary school?!

Since the decision on 4th March we have been contacted by many unhappy parents across the county all asking us what they can do. Like us, they believe their children deserve better.

To join us in our campaign and keep up to date with news and developments visit our website at
http://www.our-community-our-school.co.uk/ or mail us at support@our-community-our-school.co.uk.
We would love to hear from you.

Wednesday, 12 March 2008

School review cost 'Out Of Control'

As reported by the East Anglian Times

When Suffolk County Council decided to pursue its school organisation review (SOR) last year, the entire process was expected to cost between £58million and £70million.
But it has now emerged the cost of the SOR in Haverhill and Lowestoft alone could cost as much as £73million, with the Haverhill portion now expected to cost between £18.7 and £25.7million, Lowestoft between £7.8 and £21.1million and a new secondary school for Lowestoft at a cost of £26.5million.
It means the end total for just these two towns could reach £73.3 million - more than £3million above the original cost set out for the entire SOR project.
It does not account for the next areas to be looked at which include Saxmundham, Leiston, Brandon, Beccles, Bungay, Leiston, Mildenhall, Bury St Edmunds, Sudbury, Thurston and Stowmarket.
Keith Anderson, honorary secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters, Union of Women Teachers (NASUWT), said the current figures would spiral upwards still further if the council created a new sixth form centre for Haverhill.He said he now feared, faced with the mounting SOR bill, the county council might plug for the cheapest option.“It would not surprise me if they try doing this on the cheap. The reality will start to come home and this is just Haverhill and Lowestoft. This will be a huge concern for pupils, parents and staff.”

Full story at: http://www.eadt.co.uk/content/eadt/news/story.aspx?brand=EADOnline&category=News&tBrand=EADOnline&tCategory=news&itemid=IPED10%20Mar%202008%2023%3A05%3A14%3A940